• TeaWithDani
    link
    fedilink
    3•4 months ago

    Sure but you moved the goalpost from ‘‘they weren’t allowed’’ to “they aren’t being honest”. There’s people in this thread who are in the repos, so we can find that out without assuming.

    Also, at least their model is opensource and can easily be selfhosted on consumer hardware. Helps with your datacenter point from earlier. Like if this project does what it says its supposed to do, it’s genuinely interesting. If they are pushing the boundaries of permissive licensing then yeah that is really concerning.

    • Sure but you moved the goalpost from ‘‘they weren’t allowed’’ to "they aren’t being honest

      No. I included the lack of honesty in my original explanation.

      If anyone’s moving goalposts, it’s you with your constant shifting from one point to the other to excuse their behavior.

      If they are pushing the boundaries of permissive licensing then yeah that is really concerning.

      Unless OP is a total lie, they clearly are.

          • TeaWithDani
            link
            fedilink
            2•4 months ago

            Would you find it acceptable if their claims at face value were true?

                  • TeaWithDani
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2•
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Yeah, its a strategy when you want someone to understand something they clearly haven’t. You restate it in different words. You may have addressed it, that doesn’t mean you understood my position. I don’t mean that to sound bitchy btw. 😅 We just chatting. We cool. 👉 👉