Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

    • @Danny220@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 hours ago

      from what I understood, you have to opt in. so by default, Gemini will not have access to your gallery. It’s just matter of time tho when will Google force this upon it’s users imo

    • @87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 hours ago

      uninstall it or uninstall all app updates and nuke the app data, then switch to local storage and fossify gallery or something

      or throw out your phone and buy a fairphone or a phone compatible with grapheneOS

  • @angband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 hours ago

    These intrusive app rollouts are why they want to disable open source repositories. I have google photos disabled, and use gallery from fdroid. I have to manually leave the camera to look at photos but at least if I take a pic in private it probably stays private.

        • @undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 minutes ago

          I think they’re considered differently in law. Your employer can claim all your works while you’re employed, and you agreed to the terms of GitHub. I’m pretty sure they can lay claim to your work as well.

          Your likeness has more legal protection, I believe.

  • EtzBetz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 day ago

    Time to finally finish setting up my immich instance properly.

  • Etterra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1522 hours ago

    Time to invert the colors of some extra weird porn and stuff my Google drive to the brim.

  • @InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 day ago

    Does it matter what we do? There’s definitely some family member, friend, colleague who has taken a picture of you and your likeness will be processed.

    It’s like people tagging you in Facebook pictures even if you don’t have an account, but worse, because that was an active step. This is fully automated.

    • @angband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 hours ago

      Soon google will geomap your home interior, and have a full inventory of all your possessions. Should you resist in any way?

    • @Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      722 hours ago

      There’s definitely some family member, friend, colleague who has taken a picture of you and your likeness will be processed.

      Hah, I’m good then.

      I’m a vampire.

      • Canaconda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        621 hours ago

        Actually only DSLRs use mirrors. Every other camera can see you Nightwalker

          • Canaconda
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 hours ago

            Wouldn’t face paint just make you look like the invisible man in photos?

            • @Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              221 hours ago

              Don’t know, but in mirrors it looks funky. And I only have a Minolta Maxxum 7000. They don’t build then like they used to.

              I imagine AI finds it even weirder.

    • @RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      The main reason why I haven’t moved to Immich is backups. Storage is Hella expensive and there’s no way I store photos without a backup.

      • @Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        Backblaze B2 is about $7 a month per TB.

        Almost every major backup solution natively supports S3 compatible storage.

        • @Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          520 hours ago

          $7/month per TB is expensive as a data hoarder…

          Best to scope it down to documents, git and photos.

          The rest gets an onsite backup to externals.

        • @markko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          119 hours ago

          Obviously cloud storage is convenient, but there’s definitely better value in on-site backups.

          That works out to $84/year, which is about what you could get a 1TB HDD for.

          2 x 1TB HDDs in RAID will be much cheaper and reasonably safe in the long run.

          1TB SSDs will be even better value due to their extended lifespans, and you’d get much better speeds.

          • @Toribor@corndog.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            219 hours ago

            I back up to local storage and then replicate offsite to S3 nightly.

            On-prem backups are great and cheap and fast and definitely plan A but a robust backup solution is going to require offsite storage of some sort. Object storage is one of the cheapest ways to do that for most situations, particularly for things that can’t be replaced like photos.

            • @markko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              219 hours ago

              I’d do the same if I wasn’t so tight with my money lol. I prefer having multiple on-site backups so I don’t have the subscription fees.

              If something bad enough happens to my house that it destroys all my backups then I imagine photos are not going to be very high on my list of priorities.

    • @Rookeh@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 day ago

      Same, I set it up a few years ago and both me and my partner have been using it since then with no issues at all, it’s completely replaced Google Photos for us.

      We’ve also set up immich-frame and repurposed an old Google Nest hub to use as a digital photo frame.

      • @DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 day ago

        I’ve written a python script that fetches a random image from an immich album using its API, every 30 seconds and sets it as my media pc (Ubuntu) wallpaper. Serves as a frame when no windows are open. Recently updated the code to fetch images only when the desktop has mouse focus, to save unnecessary HDD reads when I’m watching something.

  • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    771 day ago

    Why search for a doctor’s appointment when Google has access to all your calendar events. Why search for a party invite when it reads all your emails. And why search for a specific photo of you and your loved ones to create an image, when it sees all your photos.

    They try very hard to sell this as something positive and not the privacy invasive nightmare it is.

  • @lostoncalantha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 day ago

    GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

    • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      822 hours ago

      GrapheneOS isn’t a replacement for Google Photos though? What do you use for photo backups? (Immich seems like the obvious answer, but I’d like to know if there’s more options out there)

      • @snrkl@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        622 hours ago

        It let’s you run Google Photos without network permissions and with storage scopes limiting it to certain folders.

        • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 hours ago

          Does the photo search still work offline? It doesn’t for me. That seems like it’d be the only reason to stick with that app if you’re not using the cloud storage, otherwise I might as well just use a basic file browser.

          • @snrkl@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 hours ago

            I don’t upload my photos to the cloud, and don’t use the search function. It’s just a photo library app on the phone. It seems to do a better job of post processing the pics from my Pixel, which is why in use it.

          • @ramenshaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 hours ago

            I use google photos to pull up old pics that have already been uploaded for a long time. Google photos requires you to share your entire library otherwise it doesn’t let you view photos from the cloud, but GOS let’s you tell google photos that you’re sharing your whole library when you actually aren’t. Google doesn’t have access to any of my new pics but I can still view all my old stuff.

    • @qaeta@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      424 hours ago

      It’s so easy to install! You just need to be in the 3% of smartphone owners who actually have one! EASY!

      rolls eyes

    • steel_for_humans
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 day ago

      My only issue is with banking apps and our national ID app which is very useful. I know some work, but I haven’t seen all that I have listed, so I would have to be the guinea pig :) I actually have an older Pixel phone with a shattered screen, I was planning to have it repaired, so I guess that’s where I can test GrapheneOS safely.

    • @osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exactly. It’s google. They’re scanning EVERYTHING. Even if you don’t use google, they probably know about you from OTHERS’ devices who are using google.