• @WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    419 minutes ago

    They hate their own franchise and fans.

    Let’s just boycott them all together, and remind them that they were literally always nothing without us.

  • @psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    417 hours ago

    It really is a testament to the strength of Nintendo’s (and Game Freak’s) brand and characters that they can have so many fans, making so much awesome fan art and content, all while being the absolutely most abusive and toxic to those fans and artists.

    Like, most creators and franchises would kill for a community to spring up, or for people to engage with their work outside of their work. They’d consider it free advertising, and in fact they sometimes even pay for contests and things like that to drum up some kind of fan community and momentum.

    And then Nintendo is out here hunting momentum and affection wherever they can find it, and it keeps springing up despite that 😛

  • Sundray
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2012 hours ago

    And meanwhile, National Geographic didn’t make even ONE complaint!

    Do better, Nintendo.

  • @mmyu@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7117 hours ago

    I’ve honestly never heard of this channel before, but this just seems dumb. It’s like free advertising for Nintendo.

    As usual Nintendo goes legally overboard for really no good reason at all. In this case honestly I don’t even understand why Nintendo wasted their time. It’s a YouTube channel, not a competitor.

    • Infrapink
      link
      fedilink
      326 minutes ago

      There’s a backstory!

      The whole video is worth watching and the channel is great, but here’s the TL;DW.

      When Nintendo released Donkey Kong in America in 1981, Universal Pictures sued them for copyright infringement on that grounds that Donkey Kong was too similar to Universal’s King Kong. Nintendo won because their lawyer, named Kirby, pointed out that back in 1933, RKO pictures successfully proved that the novel King Kong was public domain, so they didn’t have to pay the author any royalties or licensing rights.

      While they won, the experience was traumatic for Nintendo of America at the time. They were not lawyers; they were mostly Japanese programmers and engineers, and they really didn’t want to go through such a costly legal case again. The solution was to aggressively defend their own brand so that nobody would ever be in any doubt as to who owns the copyright and trademarks.

      Oh, and then there’s money. Nintendo have some of the most valuable IPs on Earth; other companies would kill for just one thing as popular and recognisable as Mario, Zelda, Animal Crossing, Splatoon, StarFox, or even Metroid, let alone Pokémon. People also bring up that they’re loaded, and that’s true, but Nintendo’s war chest isn’t anywhere near as big as the likes of Sony and Microsoft. In a protracted legal battle, Nintendo would run out of money first, so again, their solution is to aggressively attack anything that could remotely weaken their own brand so as to stave off bigger legal battles in the future.

    • Chloé 🥕
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 hours ago

      “you were having fun without paying us? this cannot stand.”

    • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 hours ago

      It’s like free advertising for Nintendo.

      eh, a lot of people have been Pokémon fans since childhood before they gave very much thought to such things as “advertising” or “copyright” or “corporations”, and we find things like this entertaining. I think I may even have watched some of that channel’s videos at some point, though am not sure whether I may be confusing it with another one.

  • @TheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3817 hours ago

    Yeah I saw this the other day, sounds like Nintendo’s lawyers may have taken action because of the Patreon of all things?

    It’s mind-blowing why they would do this. Just seems so needless.

    • Lemmyng
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1714 hours ago

      Was the Patreon for the nature documentary series specifically, or for the creator as a whole?

      If it’s the former, I can see why Nintendo would think they’d have an opening to issue a takedown for someone who’s monetizing and profiting off their IP.

      It’s why Yuzu and Ryujinx were met with a terrible fate after they paywalled early access builds that they advertised as being able to play BOTW/TOTK prior to release due to leaked copies breaking street date.

  • null
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 hours ago

    Was the series done as a tongue-in-cheek parody or was it dry and seemingly authentic? If it was the latter then I could see why Nintendo would go after them as they were profiting from the IP. Nintendo already sells official pokedex-like merch and media.